legal_gov · Due Process Clause · Equal Protection Clause · EU AI Act Annex III
Judicial Sentencing / Parole
Algorithmic sentencing discovery requires independent verify — not vendor PDF
—EU AI Act high-risk — justice administration
Regulatory exposure — commonly overlooked:
Courts demanding AI transparency while vendors claim trade secret — cryptographic receipt resolves impasse. · Federal agencies disagree on AI approach — but examiners agree internal logs are insufficient.
TAM / Exposure
Govtech sentencing tools · Loomis v. Wisconsin precedent chain
Insurance lines
Municipal liability · Judicial E&O
Exhibit authority
US Federal Exhibit — Due Process Algorithmic Sentencing Pack
Global leaders
EU Commission · ACLU · COMPAS vendors · State court admins · NAIC · FTC · EEOC · CFPB
COMPAS legacy
Wisconsin required disclosure — Velaru makes disclosure independently verifiable.
EU Art 14 oversight
Human oversight must be documented — not asserted in policy manual.
Municipal D&O
County buys risk assessment AI — county executives personally named in civil rights suits.
[United States (Federal)] Agency pincer
FTC, CFPB, EEOC, and DOJ all active on AI — one receipt chain satisfies cross-agency discovery.
[United States (Federal)] Federal preemption fight
State laws filling void — multistate operators need jurisdiction-tagged receipts.
[Text / Chat] Modality hook
Baseline — all frameworks apply to text decisions.
7 mandate layers (live)
Regulatory ClockCountdown to operative regulatory deadline — NAIC adoption, GSE mandate, EU transposition.Open →
Domain ClassifierIndustry-specific SAFE/CRISIS/VIOLATION with regulatory framework mapping.Open →
Exhibit / Filing PackRegulator-ready external validation — NAIC Exhibit D, Fannie QC, EU FRIA, FDA Part 11.Open →
Mandate RegistryEnroll deployers/insureds under vertical-specific governance mandate.Open →