platform · DSA Article 17 · DSA Article 24 · EU AI Act Article 50
Content Moderation / DSA
DSA requires statement of reasons for moderation — receipt IS the statement
—DSA transparency report cycle + EU enforcement
Regulatory exposure — commonly overlooked:
Platforms produce aggregate transparency reports — regulators want per-decision audit for systemic risk. · Japan soft-law approach hardening — FSA now expects bank AI documentation like BaFin.
TAM / Exposure
VLOPs/VLOSEs · €6B+ DSA fine exposure
Insurance lines
Platform liability · D&O · Cyber
Exhibit authority
Japan METI AI Pack — DSA Art 17/24 Moderation Decision Pack
Global leaders
Meta · Google · EU Commission · Ofcom · DSA enforcement · METI · SoftBank · Toyota
Art 17 complaint
User appeal requires original decision record — internal DB not sufficient for independence.
Systemic risk
VLOP designation requires risk assessment — moderation AI decisions are the data.
UK Online Safety
Ofcom parallel — same receipt primitive serves both regimes.
[Japan] Aging society
Japan healthcare AI urgency — receipt for elder care and nursing decisions.
[Japan] Automotive
Toyota/Honda AV — NHTSA equivalent documentation for JAMA standards.
[Text / Chat] Modality hook
Baseline — all frameworks apply to text decisions.
7 mandate layers (live)
Regulatory ClockCountdown to operative regulatory deadline — NAIC adoption, GSE mandate, EU transposition.Open →
Domain ClassifierIndustry-specific SAFE/CRISIS/VIOLATION with regulatory framework mapping.Open →
Exhibit / Filing PackRegulator-ready external validation — NAIC Exhibit D, Fannie QC, EU FRIA, FDA Part 11.Open →
Mandate RegistryEnroll deployers/insureds under vertical-specific governance mandate.Open →